Here

And then this Bear, Pooh Bear, Winnie-the-Pooh, F.O.P. (Friend of Piglet's), R.C. (Rabbit's Companion), P.D. (Pole Discoverer), E.C. and T.F. (Eeyore's Comforter and Tail-finder)--in fact, Pooh himself--said something so clever that Christopher Robin could only look at him with mouth open and eyes staring, wondering if this was really the Bear of Very Little Brain whom he had know and loved so long.

Sunday, July 31, 2005

"fake yeshivish."

i think it was robert k merton who did some neat stuff in the sociology of science by studying networks of citations. i also recall seing a study about reading habits of liberal and conservative Americans, which found that the networks of books read rarely overlap (not too many republicans read Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them, for example, and not too many people who read that astute piece of social commentary read the conservative analogs...). i couldn't find that study but this analysis of blogging networks is similar - especially look at the pretty picture on page 3 ; )
all that by way of introduction...

being back in manhattan, and once again among the west side and YU type people whose myopia prevents them from seeing off this smelly island, i have had numerous occasions to laugh, or get indignant, at the designation, often with a derrogatory undertone, of some YU community or other where peope happen to wear dark suits as "yeshivish." I always reply, smugly, "those people are fake yeshivish. i lived in brooklyn." but what do i mean by that besides "your xenohobic identity politics are annoying"?

basically, and this is not a super interesting point, i think "Modern" vs. "yeshivish" circles could be mapped very much like the liberal and conservative map cited above, based on two basic sets of factors:

1- the authorities generally cited or studied (eg: the "fake yeshivish" still quote a lot of the Rav, whom they often even call that, and very little of Rav Pam, Rav Belsky, etc. they read the jewish press or the jewish week and the Times, not hamodia or the yated. the real yeshivish often fill their bookcases with random compilations of achronish torah, the fake yeshivish generally don't. )

2- the sociological/cultural background or awareness of the members (even if they "frummed out," anyone who went to dayschol still knows a lot about secular movies and books that your average touro student doesn't. particularly on the books end ;) fake yeshivish are more likely, too, i would guess, to associate socially with people who would clearly not be defined as yeshivish -eg, their kippah-sruga sporting brother in teanech - than they are to visit boro park on a regular basis. and they probably still know a lot more about YU than Lakewood.)

caveat: the children of the fake yeshivish may go to real yeshivish schools and become real yeshivish themselves, or they may themelves go to fake yeshivish schools and continue to corrupt "Modern" communities with their black hats and strange sense of fealty to halachah.

anyway, perhaps an aspiring sociologist of orthodoxy could make more out of this...

ps - as this sudden spate of blogging may suggest, i am officially on vacation. for real. carefree (aka plan-free, but whatever...) smile for me!

3 Comments:

At 9:22 AM, Blogger Josh said...

Hey - didn't realize you had a blog (link duly added).

I'm not sure terms like "yeshivish" and "fake yeshivish" are useful terms. Back at U of C I was thinking of some of these issues through the prism of social networking analysis.

Following my assumption that the community is sacred, it's not surprising that Jewish communities will shun anything outside of their socially accepted canon as it may result in a change in their society.

Thus, people in YU will be more likely to quote the leaders of that community as opposed to the leaders of another. Even the degree to which "secular" books may be imported will be subject to the limits of that culture.

 
At 10:56 AM, Blogger miriam said...

welcome, then.
i'm not sure these terms are useful either. in fact, they're probably not. but i do use them sometimes and they're insitnctivley relevant, if still not useful, in certain contexts. (for example, when someone suggests to me that I "broaden my horizons" to include "yeshivish" people by learning at stern...)

anwyay, useful or not, i think it is interesting that some communities pay lip service to communities with which they are not actually, in sociological terms, affiliated. non-yeshivish/non-charedi right-wing (and i dislike that designation too, but whatever) people often do not, or certainly would not say that they do, think of charedi judaism as an "external threat" to their "sacred community." just lemaaseh, they are only marginally related. that's what i think is interesting.

 
At 3:52 PM, Blogger jacob said...

"Modern compilations of achronish torah" I love it.

I am sometimes tempted to tell "fake" people that in real yeshivish communities their "torah" is not really respected. I dont know much about the curiculum of YU but most of these same people arent familiar with the standard "yeshivisha raid" on the regular yehsivisha sugyas. Nor can they converse in orach chaim. At some point I have to start my blog. I will elt you know when I do.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home